|
| |
|
Harvesting
an
Olive
Orchard |
Determining Optimal Harvest Time -
click for complete discussion
Picking
olives in California is usually done by hand
or with vibrating rakes. More extensive machine picking will probably
be common soon. Expect 3 tons per acre yield
from mature trees or 80 pounds per tree.
For hobby farmers get your friends to do it in return for some free olive oil or pay farm
labor. A good laborer can harvest 200 - 500 pounds of olives a day
depending on variety, terrain, tree size, etc. Expect harvest to account
for 45-65% of the total production cost for olives or $200 to
$300 per ton. Machine picking requires forethought as the trees
must be the right variety, must be planted with proper spacing and must
be pruned appropriately.
 |
A single operator can harvest 800-1000 lbs. of olives a day.
We have hear from some growers that they can pick a tree with 150 to 170
kilos in about an hour. (Moving nets and collecting the fruit is extra
time). Rake teeth in two sizes to facilitate penetration into the crown of
the tree. The combing action of the fingers harvests without damaging fruit
or trees. Adjustable rake inclination 7'4" - 7'10" Telescopic extension
extends to 11', 10", reaches to 15 ft.
MORE - Contact
for
purchase information |
| |
Hand held pneumatic shakers attach to a
standard compressor as used for spraying, etc. A hook attaches to large
limbs and shakes the olives loose, similar to the combs above. Go to
Catalog For
shakers contact:
|
 |
Vibrator type olive picker. The vibrator type harvester is superior to the
shaker in that it has only a 1/2 inch travel so causes less trauma to the
tree. The device can be attached to a 85 hp tractor and utilizes a
hydraulic pump to transfer power to the vibrating head. Harvesting nets
are first placed under the tree. The operator grasps the trunk with
the harvester and vibrates for 10 to 15 seconds. The vibration works
its way up the tree and the olives come raining down.
|

Korvan
harvester |
Sacramento: U.C. extension specialist Louise
Ferguson moderated an excellent morning session at the California
League of Food Processors Expo February 5th
2002. Below are synopses of two
presentations.
Testing of mechanical harvesters
She started out the session with her field test of the Korvan 5000,
Agrite and Olipicker olive harvesters. Again, many of the assumptions
were oriented toward “black ripe” canning olives, Manzanillo being the
dominant variety. Louise and U.C. have been involved for years with
this project. Picking labor has been increasingly expensive and
difficult to obtain and is the largest cost growers face. The Agrite
is a self propelled picker while the Olipicker is a tractor mounted
articulated arm with oscillating head similar to the
Olivary. Much of her subsequent remarks centered around the
Korvan, a self-propelled platform with multiple rotating heads with
long plastic fingers and a catch frame and conveyor system. It takes
one operator driving, keeping the catch frame skirts in contact with
the trunk and another operating the rotating picking heads on swing
arms. The machine moves at 1/2 MPH and can pick a tree in about 60
seconds. This works out to harvesting .4 acre per hour. Machine
operators are paid $13/hr and a helper is around $9/hr. Korvan cost is
around $200K. The machine is being sold as cost effective for olive
orchards of greater than 180 acres.
|
Mechanical picking involves several different operations. The first is fruit
removal. The Korvan removed 66% of the fruit in the trials. The fruit that was
removed tended to be more mature and larger. Canners want minimal bruising
during this step and the Korvan is fairly kind to the olive. A spokesman for
Bell Carter, one of the largest canners in California, reported that last year
mechanically harvested olives brought in to their inspection station 5 hours
after harvesting had a damage rate of 35%. 2/3 of damaged olives were only
minimally damaged, 1/3 had moderate to severe bruising or cuts. (Hand harvested
fruit has a much lower damage rate). This could be minimized by brining the
olives in the field but cannery representatives in the audience noted that doing
so would prohibitively double transportation costs.
The second step is catching the olive. Earlier versions of the Korvan had
problems catching the olives but the manufacturer reported that now only about
10% or less miss the catch frame and are lost to the ground. This could be
minimized by buying left and right hand versions of the machine to run in tandem
down the rows or by pulling a catch frame with a tractor on the other side of
the tree.
The olives must then be collected and conveyed to a cleaner, in this case a
powerful fan, and dumped into orchard boxes. The Korvan will be built to order
this year. It is anticipated that contract pickers will buy the machine as is
done in the almond, walnut and grape businesses.
Economic Model of Mechanical Harvesting
Karen Klonsky then took the results of the field test and extrapolated an
economic model for mechanical harvesting. Contract harvesting was priced at
$250/acre plus $150/ton. Other assumptions: Because the mechanical harvester
preferentially removes riper, larger olives, culls would be 2.3% with the
harvester, 3.7% with hand picking. The harvester would remove 66% of the olives,
hand labor would remove 95%. Mechanical harvesting would be followed by hand
harvesting to remove unpicked fruit. Price received would be $720/ton for
mechanically harvested olives, $708 for hand picked olives. Hand harvesting
would cost $260 per ton.
Karen concluded that mechanical harvest costs per ton were lower than hand
harvest costs but removal rate is lower. At 3 tons of olive yield per acre the
cost for mechanical and hand picking is about the same. With higher yield per
acre the cost of mechanical picking would seem to decrease. Although close, at
all yields per acre hand harvesting gave higher revenues per acre than
mechanical harvesting. As efficiency of mechanical harvesting increases and cost
of hand harvesting increases, mechanical harvesting will become more attractive.
Although mechanical hedging and topping of olive trees gives the machine a nicer
working surface, Louise Ferguson cautioned that in her experience it drastically
decreased yields. More research must be done in optimizing existing trees for
mechanical harvesting.
For the full Powerpoint presentation:
Mechanical Harvesting of Olives
Contact
Korvan for pricing on sidepass harvesters.
 |
Straddle harvesters straddle
the row as in the trees shown here at the California Olive Ranch in Gridley,
CA. Usually dwarf varieties are used and the trees must be planted and
pruned in hedges.
Korvan makes a
modified grape harvester which will pick dwarf monoconal pruned trees |
Recommendations for Maintaining Postharvest Quality
|